April 25, 2025
Trying to pick the best creative analytics tool? This guide breaks down how Motion’s creative analytics and Bestever’s ad analysis compare in 2025.
Motion focuses on high-level trends across campaigns, making it a solid choice for teams that need to report on performance or plan creative strategy across multiple accounts.
Bestever looks into every element of an ad, making it ideal for marketers who want to understand why a specific creative is underperforming so they can fix it.
In this comparison, we’ll dig into how each tool works and compares.
In this article, we’ll cover:
Let’s start by taking a look at what Motion is.
Motion is a creative analytics platform that helps marketers and strategy teams analyze ad performance across campaigns and accounts. It highlights patterns in formats, themes, and messaging, making it easier to understand what types of creatives are driving results at scale.
You can tag creatives by concept (like “testimonial” or “unboxing”), track performance over time, and see how trends evolve. This makes it easier to spot what’s working across your whole ad library, even if you’re not deeply involved in your creative production.
Here are a few things to know about the Motion app:
Bestever is a creative analytics tool that focuses on individual ad performance, helping marketers understand what’s working inside each creative. It analyzes ads frame by frame to score elements like clarity, pacing, and CTA strength. Unlike tools that focus on campaign-wide trends, it’s designed to improve performance at the creative level.
It scores ads based on things like how strong the hook is, whether the message is clear, if the CTA stands out, and how well the creative matches your brand. It also flags when ads are starting to fatigue and gives suggestions for what to change.
Here are a few things to know about Bestever:
Both platforms fall under creative analytics, but they serve different needs. If you’re trying to figure out which one fits your workflow, this side-by-side breakdown highlights how their features compare:
If you’re deciding between Motion and Bestever, it really comes down to how your team works and what kind of insights you need.
Bestever is a good fit if your team is focused on performance. It’s built for marketers and content teams who want to know why an ad isn’t converting and what to fix. If you’re testing lots of creative, running paid campaigns, and need feedback you can act on quickly, Bestever might be a good option.
Motion is better for strategy teams or agencies managing a large volume of campaigns. It gives you a high-level view of trends across accounts, so you can see what themes are working without digging into individual creatives. It’s ideal for planning, reporting, and spotting patterns over time.
It depends on how you use UGC. Motion can help you spot trends if you're running lots of UGC across campaigns, but it doesn’t analyze the creative itself. If you want feedback on what’s inside each video, like tone, visuals, or performance cues, Bestever is a better fit. It breaks down each video frame by frame and highlights what’s working and what needs improvement.
Bestever breaks down each video frame by frame and scores it across specific elements like the hook, clarity, CTA, pacing, and brand alignment. These scores help you understand where the creative is strong and where it may need some improvement.
Yes, and many teams do. Motion helps you find what themes or formats are trending across accounts. Bestever takes that a step further and shows you exactly what’s working (or not) inside each ad.
If you want to improve performance on Facebook specifically, Bestever is the stronger option. It works with your Meta ad data, flags creative fatigue, and shows which parts of the ad are helping or hurting results.
Not directly. Motion shows performance trends over time, which can hint at fatigue, but it doesn’t flag it or offer suggestions on what to change.
Yes. Based on historical performance and scoring patterns, Bestever can highlight which creatives are most likely to perform well.
Motion is built with agencies in mind. It lets you manage multiple accounts in one place, tag creative themes, and create high-level reports to share with clients or internal teams.
Bestever is better if you need quick feedback on what’s working in a single ad or a batch of creatives. You’ll get frame-level insights without having to wait for performance data to trickle in.
Bestever looks beyond surface metrics. You’ll get insights on hold rate, brand clarity, hook strength, and even whether the ad fits your intended audience. It’s focused on the creative itself — not just how it performed.
Motion is focused on analysis only, it doesn’t generate ads. Bestever, on the other hand, does offer ad generation features, though its primary focus remains on ad analysis. If you’re looking for AI-generated ads, AdCreative or its alternatives are an option worth exploring.
Not in the traditional sense. Most digital intelligence platforms focus on tracking user behavior across websites and channels. Bestever, on the other hand, focuses specifically on creative performance, giving you insights into how your ad content is performing and how to improve it.
Now that we’ve looked at Motion’s creative analytics and Bestever’s ad analytics side by side, it’s clear they serve different goals. Motion is best for spotting creative trends across campaigns and accounts and is great if you need a high-level view of what’s working overall.
But if your goal is to improve individual ad performance and make creative decisions that drive results, Bestever gives you the deeper feedback you need. Here’s how it helps you refine your campaigns:
Ready to see how you can improve your creatives? Let our team show you how Bestever can break down what’s working and what to fix, so you can improve performance without wasting spend.